Close X

How the LDS Church's missionary announcement hit home

Kate Ensign-Lewis - October 10, 2012
source: LDS Living

Screenshot image of October 2012 General Conference; reaction of audience members to Pres. Monson's missionary announcement.

There have been a lot of changes going on since President Monson's historic announcement on LDS missionary work last Saturday. Take our poll and tell us how you and your family were affected.

When President Thomas S. Monson stood at the pulpit on Saturday morning and began to talk about missionary service and the age variability in different countries, my husband turned to me and said, mouth slightly agape, "They're going to change the minimum missionary age." Moments later, we saw that he was right when President Monson said young men could serve at 18. My initial thought: What a blessing this would be to so many young men.

Our surprise and pleasure was compounded when they announced a lower age (age 19) for young women as well. My initial reaction to this was what many people felt: That is was wonderful for the young women of the Church, and that surely there would be more of them serving missions as a result. I was thrilled. (Many of you said the same on our Facebook page.)

Already we have seen huge shifts in Mormon life from the announcement: young men who are planning for a mission a year earlier than they expected (or deciding when to go, like high school basketball standout Jabari Parker), young women who are changing their life and college plans now that a mission seems more accessible and colleges that are trying to accommodate new enrollment policies. It will certainly take some adjustment, but the resulting blessings from the change are innumerable.

The effect on the Church's young adults is astounding, but there is also certainly an effect (though more personal) on the adults of the Church - especially the women.

Rewind for a second back to Saturday morning: Not long after President Monson announced the change, I had my secondary reaction: I thought, "If the age of service for women had been 19 when I was 19, I probably would have served a mission." I have always wanted to serve, but while I made plans to go on a mission as a young adult, I met my one-day husband, and marriage instead of mission ended up being the right thing for me.

I know this situation has played out for many women over the years (and even some men). There's no way to say what definitely would have been. After all, if I'd served a mission at 19, would I have met my husband? It all comes down to personal revelation, I know, but we at LDS Living are still curious to know: How did the news affect you, personally? And how did the news affect your family? 

Women: Do you think you probably would have served a mission if this policy had been in effect when you were younger?







Men: Do you think this policy would have affected your decision to serve if it had been in effect when you were younger (either by serving earlier, or by serving at all)?






Since the announcement, my children at home are:

If you don't have children, you may apply it to friends or siblings who are missionary age.







© LDS Living, 2012.
Comments 3 comments

luvbnamomma said...

07:49 AM
on Oct 10, 2012

Report Abuse

I did serve a mission. I knew as a young child that I wanted to serve a mission. I felt like I was just treading water after High School for three years until I could go. I did go to college yet, the study skills I learned on my mission helped me so much in college that I got more done in the year after I got home than I did in the three years before I left. I was also ready to date once I got home. My mission was a huge influence in who I married. It has made me a better wife and mother. I am really excited that more sisters will have the opportunity to serve. They are needed in the mission field. The biggest thing for me, was realizing that the work is still going forth and we are all needed. Living in Utah, sometimes I forget that this work really is progressing. It is an exciting time!

jazzer_girl said...

09:02 AM
on Oct 10, 2012

Report Abuse

President Monson's announcement of lowering the age ym can serve missions left me with bitter/sweet emotions. I think it is fabulous and had wished for many years that ym could serve at 18. Though one of my sons served a mission, 2 of his younger brothers did not. They were both planning to serve and even saved their own money to do to. Unfortunately they both drifted toward worldly persuasions by their 19th birthdays and chose not to serve. This has led to inactivity due to embarrassment/shame they each feel for not going on their missions. Had they been able to serve at 18 when they truly were looking forward to a mission, life would be different for them! It's a wonderful, inspired change....just a little late for our family.

milliemumof7 said...

09:04 AM
on Oct 10, 2012

Report Abuse

In Sweden the youths don't graduate until they are 19 and then the boys do the military service. Same goes for most European countries so this is clearly an American Policy. Our boys will just feel very old, compared to the US boys. For the girls it is great though. At BYU I met so many girls whose boyfriends refused to wait for them, as the girls had waited for them. Now every girl that wants to serve can do so and not have to be threatened with that her boyfriend will marry someone else. At that age, one feels that one will only get one chance at marriage. Truth is, one only gets one chance at going on a mission and one will live to regret that one did not go when the desire was there!!!
Leave a Comment
Login to leave a comment.